Free to...? God Bless...? Support...?
Oct. 3rd, 2001 03:47 pmAm I being selfish when I say I really hope we don't go to war? We being the U.S., by the way. I don't know about you, dear reader, where you are, what religion or ethnicity or nationality or whatever you are-- I don't care. As far as I am concerned, LIFE is LIFE. Forget skin color, eye color, disability, speech impediments... any of that doesn't matter.
People are going around being patriotic or whatever, spouting their opinions about what we should or shouldn't do next. This country is supposed to represent everyone's voice as one, right? But there is no perfect government. You have to remember that, even in democracy, those who aren't part of the "majority rules" are muffled. Their opinions and beliefs die a quiet death (well, sometimes) and that's the end of that. People go on being persecuted, unhappy, and upset over a situation, because a majority made it that way.
We judge the Taliban even though we aren't living in Afganistan-- we aren't starving, we aren't as sick and needy as they are.
So Bush wants to hunt the people that did this down. Supposedly we've got proof that Osama bin Laden is behind the attacks on the Pentagon, the World Trade Towers, etc... but what good will it do us to bomb the people? The innocent people of Afghanistan, who don't have the strength nor the resources to rebel against the Taliban?
Even if the Taliban is some horrible, dictatorship or whatever, where the people suffer and the government is all well off, will bombing the people do us any good? The Taliban won't suffer at all from such an act. The way I see it, we're in that situation our parents always told us about-- the one in the playground sandbox. A bigger kid pushes you out, and you get hurt. Do you fight back, and risk getting hurt more, to get your message across, or do you back down, and get laughed at teased, and possibly injured again later? What happened to that alternative of standing up without fighting? Going to an authority, and making the bully back down?
Maybe in a situation like today, we can't really find a higher authority, and we can't "stand up" without getting hurt. We're between a rock and a hard place, really, and people are wondering if we have "the belly" to do what needs to be done.
What needs to be done though? Do we *need* to go to war? People will die-- not just fighting the Taliban and Osama bin Laden's troops, but in the journey to Afghanistan-- through Pakistan. The people of Afghanistan have already suffered, so why should we make them suffer more with air raids and bombings?
If we mobilize ground troops, what's to say that we won't end up hurting people who aren't totally sure of what they are fighting for, who are blinded by ideals and beliefs that no one, for fear of their own lives and their family's miniscule well-being, has dared to challenge before?
Some people think war is inevitable, and the country (Afghanistan) will be better off in the end. All countries and generations must suffer to prosper later, right? But why should we? To prove a point to the youth of this era? WHY?
People are going around being patriotic or whatever, spouting their opinions about what we should or shouldn't do next. This country is supposed to represent everyone's voice as one, right? But there is no perfect government. You have to remember that, even in democracy, those who aren't part of the "majority rules" are muffled. Their opinions and beliefs die a quiet death (well, sometimes) and that's the end of that. People go on being persecuted, unhappy, and upset over a situation, because a majority made it that way.
We judge the Taliban even though we aren't living in Afganistan-- we aren't starving, we aren't as sick and needy as they are.
So Bush wants to hunt the people that did this down. Supposedly we've got proof that Osama bin Laden is behind the attacks on the Pentagon, the World Trade Towers, etc... but what good will it do us to bomb the people? The innocent people of Afghanistan, who don't have the strength nor the resources to rebel against the Taliban?
Even if the Taliban is some horrible, dictatorship or whatever, where the people suffer and the government is all well off, will bombing the people do us any good? The Taliban won't suffer at all from such an act. The way I see it, we're in that situation our parents always told us about-- the one in the playground sandbox. A bigger kid pushes you out, and you get hurt. Do you fight back, and risk getting hurt more, to get your message across, or do you back down, and get laughed at teased, and possibly injured again later? What happened to that alternative of standing up without fighting? Going to an authority, and making the bully back down?
Maybe in a situation like today, we can't really find a higher authority, and we can't "stand up" without getting hurt. We're between a rock and a hard place, really, and people are wondering if we have "the belly" to do what needs to be done.
What needs to be done though? Do we *need* to go to war? People will die-- not just fighting the Taliban and Osama bin Laden's troops, but in the journey to Afghanistan-- through Pakistan. The people of Afghanistan have already suffered, so why should we make them suffer more with air raids and bombings?
If we mobilize ground troops, what's to say that we won't end up hurting people who aren't totally sure of what they are fighting for, who are blinded by ideals and beliefs that no one, for fear of their own lives and their family's miniscule well-being, has dared to challenge before?
Some people think war is inevitable, and the country (Afghanistan) will be better off in the end. All countries and generations must suffer to prosper later, right? But why should we? To prove a point to the youth of this era? WHY?